".....the Mivatek stipulation may or may not have considerations for royalty issues. ..."

It basically means, that the dismissal considerations bound by the stipulations could have anything decided between the parties within them....regardless of the ordered conclusion.

I've somewhat pointed out that the text, IMO, of the dismissal order is vague ...

"The parties have filed a stipulation of dismissal dated June 30, 2016. ECF No. 33. Because the stipulation is signed by all parties who have appeared, it is effective without court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). This case has been dismissed with prejudice.The Clerk shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 30, 2016"

With that shot phrase, you can not draw any conclusions as in the past, not me anyway.....The way that order is composed, the responsibility for its content belongs to both parties, can they just point to...e.g e.Digitals resolution of with prejudice, or better, do they have to detail the full conclusion? The order is effective without court order.

Though I've compared instances of the past, they do not necessarily meet this new type conclusion, becasue ...it is effective without court order

This is a first

doni