Free
Message: Pacer: e.Digital Corporation v. iSmart Alarm, Inc. 07/27/2016

RE: iBaby

e.Digital's motion:

07/27/2016 49 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 27 Stipulation and Order, Set/Clear Flags, 42 Stipulation and Order, Requesting Continuance of ADR Deadline and Court Mediation under ADR L.R. 6 filed by e.Digital Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Gabriel G. Hedrick, # 2 Proposed Order)(Hedrick, Gabriel) (Filed on 7/27/2016) (Entered: 07/27/2016)

Courts order on e.Digital motion:

iBaby Labs, Inc., doing business as iBABY,
Defendants.
Case No. 3:15-cv-05790-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATED SELECTION OF
MEDIATION UNDER ADR L.R. 6 AND
CONTINUANCE OF JUNE 2, 2016
PRIVATE ADR DEADLINE
Current ADR Deadline: July 29, 2016
Action Filed: December 17, 2015
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING MEDIATION UNDER ADR L.R. 6 AND FOR CONTINUANCE OF JULY 29, 2016 ADR DEADLINE, and
good cause appearing therefore, the Court orders that the July 29, 2016 deadline for Private ADR

======================================================

I wonder why e.Digital when filing a motion, as in recent fashion above, that is mutual between the parties does not use the full heading showing such?

Why did e.Digital leave out the word JOINT

Had Google not slipped up...we would never be the wiser of that settled situation.

We are still waiting on iBabys motion to dismiss...the hearing was on the 7th it's now the 28th.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply