"I seem to remember a discussion a while back as to whether or not the judgment was ever executed. Has that been resolved?"

Pravda....you might be confusing the iBaby details with the Ivideon issues.

IBaby had a motion hearing 7-7-2016 on issues relating to Supreme Court rulings that have interfered with procedural methods of filing a civil case....in particular for IP infringement cases.

With that, the judge has not ruled on iBaby's motion to dismiss the case based on e.Digitals original filings along with subsequent amendments , the order lingers unanswered or un resolved. That aside, the court has ruled most recent on a joint stipulation regarding mediation issues between the parties.

=======================

As for Ivideon and e.Digitals proposed default judgment.......Invideon has had a standing motion to Vacate Entry of Default judgment doc 54....where the court had set a conference to discuss. The court, as of yesterday, has decide to dispose of the conference.

"E.DIGITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. IVIDEON LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No. 15-cv-00691-JST ORDER VACATING HEARING Re: ECF No. 54 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Vacate Entry of Default. ECF No. 54. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for August 18, 2016, is hereby vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 8, 2016"

Full docket text for document 65:
ORDER: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 8/18/2016 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 7/19/2016.(knb)

Full docket text for document 63:
ORDER LIFTING STAY. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 7/18/2016.(jao)

doni