Joe , If you read following paragraphs from Pacer it appears this motion to Amend is used to request permission from the court to change something in the original petition. It was dismissed based on Rule 84. JMO
"The Court declines to consider iBaby’s argument that "it is not clear form the FAC what is alleged to be literally infringed and what is alleged to be infringed by [the doctrine of] equivalents." ECF No. 37 at 17. This argument was not raised in iBaby’s Motion to Dismiss.
