Free
Message: Arcsoft

e.Digital Corporation v. ArcSoft, Inc.

  • Assigned to: Judge Roger T. Benitez
  • Referred to: Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick
  • Related Case: 3:14−cv−01579−BEN−DHB
  • Cause: 35:0271 Patent Infringement
  • Date Filed: 01/12/2015
  • Jury Demand: Plaintiff
  • Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
  • Jurisdiction: Federal Question
  • Date Filed # Docket Text

09/01/2016 69 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File −Joint Motion for an Extension of Time for Claim Construction Briefing and Hearing by ArcSoft, Inc. (May, Olga) (knb). (Entered: 09/01/2016)

Doc_69:

Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation and Defendant ArcSoft, Inc. jointly request that the current claim construction briefing and hearing schedule be extended as set forthbelow:

Event______________________Current date_________Extended date

Supplemental Opening Briefs___ September 16, 2016__October 13, 2016

Supplemental Responsive Briefs__September 30, 2016__October 27, 2016

Hearing on Claim Construction October 27, 2016 November 10, 2016,or subject to the Court’s convenience Good cause exists for this extension because the parties intend to resume settlement negotiations and conduct an in-person meeting during the first week of October. Conducting the meeting earlier is not practicable due to the schedule of ArcSoft’s representative, who has international travel scheduled before then.

Extending the claim construction briefing deadlines until after the meeting will save the parties’ resources and facilitate settlement.

The requested extension is brief and will result in moving out the claim construction hearing by only two weeks. The extension will not have any effect on any deadlines other than claim construction.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that this joint motion be granted.

Dated: September 1, 2016 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Olga I. May

Olga I. May

omay@fr.com

Attorneys for Defendant, ArcSoft, Inc

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply