In all fairness, EL may be including potential scenarios described by shareholders (with appropriate caveats). If so, I plead guilty, though I always make sure it`s clearly understood that what I suggest is only a possibility and by no means absolute. And I always sign off with ``I KNOW nuttin`!`` (for the past couple of years) to drive that point home. But I must say that such hypothetical scenarios are intended to be more along the lines of DD than being an intentional hype. Some might perceive otherwise....

Just as some may perceive (as I once did) that certain cut-n-pastes and links are posted with the intent of implying EDIG involvement, with zero explanation or caveats attached. Some are guilty of that, which could be more easily perceived as hype.

And that`s the problem with pointing fingers at others - you have three of `em pointin` back at you (glass houses and all that). But I think virtually everyone here has figured out over time that those cut-n-pastes and links are posted purely for informational purposes, with no direct ties to EDIG intended.

But goes to show, it`s in the perception of the reader.

EDIG to $50/share tomorrow! (Had to throw in a real hype! Anybody believe it? LOL).

SGE