I found it very interesting that EDIG/Nunally/DM did not include MP3 players specifically in their named product category for patent infringement.

Was this done by design, as it comes under the heading of "other portable devices, to not alert those they are targeting"?

Along with cell phones, going after the ipod market certainly would raise some eyebrows and get maximum exposure in the press should they be named by DM, however, I don't consider Apple "low hanging fruit", as Jobs would not likely sit still.

It sure will be interesting to see DM in action.