With respect, the article that was written that is slanderous was an article written on the blog site Seeking Alpha. It was posted furiously on SH yesterday. However, I think the poster has removed it as a result of the NR. I can't seem to locate it at the moment. INT merely stated that the G&M article spurred the slanderous article of another group. INT is not seeking legal action against G&M itself. Won, the writer in the G&M article merely stated that the company was hard to value and quoted Peter Hodson a few times, a fund manager from Sprott Inc. The slanderous article, on the other hand, suggested that INT was fudging its numbers in terms of page views and visitors, etc.