Ok fine. Being the rookie here, I'll bite. It's not what you say, it's how you say it. Nobody said for sure bashing, but from insistence of text and tone of challenge, one can imply with fair accuracy. It was suggested that due dilligence was in order. Further comments indicate some lack of that, and continued insistence that All Other Related Ways of Doing Things is the primary means of due dilligence shows a need for attention, debate and response. I did my research over five years of watching this stock. My due dilligence is those years of watching the story unfold, listening to how it has been told, and becoming willing to speculate. As in gambling. You know, making a bet.

Counting cards, I have a better chance (like now) having been in the game longer. But I don't have to count cards here. It's having faith that the next right thing is being done as it has for the years I have been watching. It's listening to square and straight info by people with a lot more experience. I have not been on this board more than a year, but have been evaluating the words of people for a living for long, long time. Some thrive on conflict, and sew chaos as an excercise of power. I believe VP said something along the lines of teeth gnashing and hand wringing while we wait. The way JB says it, (and did it) and the way VP and others have analyzed it, I'll bet on it.

The wager is placed. Care to call?

I have a good impression that VP and others may be quite right. Some recent newcomers may not be here for the due dilligence.

Respectfully, Small Taters