El gust es mio. BTW, the relative performance of LBSR compared to TMBXF continues to widen in a seeming disadvantage to LBSR shareholders.

Yes, and for now, there is dilulion weighing on the LBSR share price, but that should not account for most of the disparity here. Something is bound bring these performance levels closer to parity, if not reverse their courses. IMO, there is more reason for LBSR to move closer to TMBXF, or surpass it than for this level to be sustained, or to widen further.

http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=LBSR+Interactive#{%22comparisons%22:%22TMBXF%22,%22comparisonsColors%22:%22#cc0000%22,%22comparisonsWidths%22:%221%22,%22comparisonsGhosting%22:%220%22,%22range%22:%22ytd%22}

Otherwise, there really are not too many things allowing for a direct comparison of these companies. What they have in common is a lack of funds, though TMBXF has a non-perfoming partner. AND, their entire future may depend on whether or not the partner can collect on having won a law suite in Slovakia - and that's not looking likely, at least not in the near term.

These companies also share claim boundaries in the Hay Mounain area, but LBSR's interestes in around Arizona and in Alaska dwarf TMBXT holdings. LBSR is raising money and moving forward, or so it appears, while TMBXF seems stuck in a holding pattern.

Still, I think watching the relative performance of these stocks is important. Please note that by these posting I am in no way attempting to desparage TMBXF. I want them to succeed as they can be an important associate in the reintroduction of mining to the Tombstone area, and their cooperation may be essential on some points at a later date.

VP