Indeed. One of the pretend "experts" on "the other board" felt compelled to comment that many such outcroppings can be found- and are, in and of themselves, meaningless. However- it was not mentioned that these particular outcroppings overlay indications of considerable underlying mineral as defined by multiple interconfirming modalities, including ZTEM and Geochemical studies. This, of course, gives it a whole different context and significance. It's amazing and ludicrous the extent to which some of these guys will go to discredit anything positive that is put forward. (I am posting this here rather than "there" since I don't want to encourage their ilk by directly engaging them. It is what they crave.)