good men do nothing. A typical exchange with the ethically elastic:

"the longer LBSR can keep the anticipation and excitement going, the more shares can be converted and sold"

Another failure of logic on your [his] part. Riddle me this: What's the point of selling shares 'to keep the lights on' if Briscoe & Co. aren't putting the money directly into their pockets? What is Briscoe's actual non-deferred (owed) compensation? Next to nothing as I recall from filings.

What's the point in this case of selling shares, EXCEPT to continue efforts to advance the project?

Produce ONE factual piece of evidence that Briscoe has not directed available funds to advancing the project.

Please don't make up any fairy tales of money laundered through rent of office space and similar conspiracy (requiring multiple confederates) theories - it would be unbecoming, to the point of repetition.