So not Briscoe expects but the proven evidence purely from al of the collective workover. That being like from the day of discovery of the Bisbee 1870s, AZ geo mappings, revised AZ geo mappings, grab sampeling, plant analysis,ztem 2D 3D via Geotech Corp, gathering of expert opinions on the LBSR BOD,advancment of ZTEM into advanced latest version of ZTEM by Geotech over the entire claimset of HM by them as i recall at no cost to JB&BOD as Geotech agin wanted a good piece of land to showcase their best version of ZTEM, we have Briscoe making a discovery that the ploting for HM was off and JB&BOD corrected a sygnifacant error bringing the HM claimset into higher favor than previously anticipated.

All the above points are what favor the HM claimset, not Briscoe, just the excellent results of very good geological research over HM. So we arrive at a point today that exceedingly favors a DRILL program. Also very noteworth that back in 1870s the "OLDE TIMMERS" did'nt have ztem nor the ability to find microscopic trace minerals in ground and weed samples. Yet opinions of the HM are exceeding an expected results of the Bisbee in both production and values. If one looks at the massive size of the Bisbee and then looks at the Geotech ZTEM which is the most advanc ed ZTEM on Earth one can see that the Hay Mountain claimset is much bigger than the discovery at Bisbee. One yield i make to the Bisbee Mine is that it has made a LOT of MONEY in the tourist trade over the many years and in some of the most beautiful jewlery pieces. Hopefully we shall see some of the same for the "Tourists" here at Hay Mountain either on their way to Bisbee or on their way back to Pheonix!