Yes, "humongous" it was, at leasing in so far as evidence was suggesting back then. BUT, since then we have learned that the deeply buried porphyry deposit, as suggested by Ztem, is likely on top of a skarn deposit at and near surface (Just like the nearby Rosemont mine). If both, porphyry and skarn, are proven economic to mine, call the whole thing "humongous+++".

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=30515189

A word of caution, however. LBSR claims do not cover the whole of the mineralization identified by Ztem. Maybe they have most of it, but I believe some additional claims need to be filed, and arragements need to be made with adjoing claims holders, should developmont become feasible. For this reason, I suspect the TMBXF share price will move higher as LBSR continues it's progress at Hay Mountain.

Meanwile, TMBXF has no following on message boards - no bashers and no promoters. Very curious, especially given the very wild gyrations in it's PPS.

VP in AZ