As I indicated where I posted this news earlier this morning, detachment-faul-related mineralization is a type of mineral occurance that is not well understood and can be highlly complex to explore/develop. A lot more work needs to be done here, which explains why the market has been cool to this news, at least in the few hours since the news was out.

Were I a TMBXF basher (which I am not) on the order of LBSR bashers, I would point out that making comparisons to successful mines of this type of mineralization is rediculous and misleading at this point in time.

I will offer that this is intriguing and worth exploring, and good luck to them, given the bad deal they got from a non-performing partner.

VP