"NAK strung along our naive CEO with a ridiculous deal,..."

How would you know that about JB?  You can only be expressing an opinion unless you have insider information.  Even then, your conclusion can only be from subjective judgment.  I'd like to see you prove naivete in court.

Also, are personal attacks against persons who may not be posters allowed here, or is it limited to other board members? 

And your argument also refutes your contentions expressed elsewhere that the efforts in Alaska were a waste of time and money.  Had that been the case, why would NAK have foreclosed on nothing, let alone even lent money on it?  Still, that applies to only one target, not the whole of a score of targets in Big Chunk.

You sound like someone with an agenda.  That is an opinion, of course, I can't prove outside of court.