Well- maybe someone can explain why Gross and his clown car of "experts" is choosing to use an archaic, outdated, labor intensive, costly, time consuming and generally discredited form of geophysical investigation- namely-IP. This outmoded and not very accurate method has been mostly supplanted by more modern and effective, new methods. Maybe BG hasn't heard about them. One is called ZTEM- and it really works great!- See Hay Mountain- see Big Chunk- see Pebble. Maybe BG's "experts" would benefit from a tutorial by Jim Briscoe. Instead of laboriously attempting lay down thousands of feet of actual cable over unforgiving terrain and attempting to- often unsuccessfully-  splash electrolyte solution all around to secure conductivity over many weeks and months- one could simply overfly the area in a matter of hours- and- guess what- get an actual and vastly more accurate image of underlying deposits- see Hay Mountain- see Big Chunk- see Pebble- and many other sites. Why wouldn't ZTEM be used instead? Could it be simply because it is something that Jim Briscoe pioneered and championed? And therefore something to be avoided at all costs- with one's ego in peril. Or is it, instead, a wise and carefully considered strategy- just like everything else BG is lurching ahead with? I, for one, would like to hear the rational- if there is one.

Remember- all this lovely money is not coming to us free and clear. It is not as if we have a true investing/mining partner- we are simply once again in the thrall of another toxic lender- with all the diluting consequences- this one just a little freer with its money. We should at least be using these funds as efficiently as possible.

So rather than spend a large chunk of it attempting to outline a very spotty and questionable deposit- already abandoned by more than a few previous potential explorers and miners- maybe we should instead look at another area that has an incredibly rich and concentrated deposit- one that has already had all the studies done- geophysical, geochem and geological- one that has even already had its archeological and environmental studies done- and one that has access.  Then we wouldn't have to spend money on these studies all over again. Only if we had access to such a place. Where might such a place be? Is it possible we might already own the rights to such a place. Wouldn't that be a stroke of incredible luck! Could it be . . . .could such a place be . . .  HAY MOUNTAIN?!    Yes- it could. Now of course-just like ZTEM- this is another thing developed and promoted by Jim Briscoe. Is maybe that why it too is off limits? It's sad and pathetic if these kind of conscious or subconscious considerations are controlling our fate. But it's hard to understand otherwise why these funds are not being used to simply start drilling at Hay Mountain and instead are being spent on starting an elaborate and expensive investigative process with very questionable potential returns at Red Rock Canyon. (It was first stated that drilling would begin as soon as the acheological and environmental studies were done. But now the small matter of the IP studies has been slipped in maybe to try to figure out where exactly to drill. And it is still not clear even what qualified person will make those final decisions.)- So- good luck! And please- someone try to explain.