Yes- certainly some news is needed. But it needs to be real news- not manufactured retreads- nor vague inconsequential updates. We need those RRC assay results and any new HM results if available. And, of course, hopefully positive this time. We should also want to hear specifics of continued HM drilling. Hopefully this is happening. 
Speaking of which- our outside consultant has made two suggestions. One is- to drill deeper. We went to 3k+, but the ZTEM indicated the main porphyry body was at 5,000 feet. Since not much was intersected at shallower depths- we should go there- there are likely rich deposits there. 
Second- it was stated that the initial ZTEM was actually a relatively low resolution surveying study- something of which I was unaware. So- although it would add cost and time to the process- it was recommended that we obtain a more detailed and directed high resolution ZTEM study to direct our next drilling efforts. Otherwise we are drilling blind based on hints from the first drilling. In this day and age- that is not necessary and it would vastly increase the likelihood of success. 
It would be great if Mr. Bryce could take note of these recommendations and comment.