OK, I read the rules again (thank you for making them easy to see!). Based on the posts I've seen from Gibby, I'm not sure which rule(s) he's violated. Closest I could guess would be item 2, DEROGATORY COMMENTS TOWARDS OTHERS ... but I know I and some others have been guilty of this (appologies to all). And perhaps item 5, BASHING OR HYPING (see below):

Unsubstantiated claims of grandeur or impending doom are best left to Nostradamus as they will cost you some valuable points towards your rating. Also included in this category is repetition of the same question, fact or opinion over and over after a response has been provided or if there is currently no ascertainable answer.

Perhaps he tripped the bolded sentence? His repetition is usually in response to our repetitive optimism.

Any further insight on what wires he's tripping? Because I'm not seeing it.

Thanks!