One more comment, to clarify. If JV is on the table, then I can see that as a scenario where postponement of drilling at MW makes sense, even though it remains quite a letdown to me. If however, discussions are only about sale of PRB's MW land holding to NOT, then I dont understrand rationale of postponement. Rightly or wrongly, that is my take on it. I agree that mgt should provide shareholders with further clarification.

Now I am going to son's ballgame as enough on PRB for today. Good luck to all.

profitz