Re: Anomalies and Math
in response to
by
posted on
Jan 13, 2011 06:46PM
Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Firstly I want to thank Sculpin & Hog and all the others for their very valuable information and for directing me here.
Regarding the ovoid, and referring to the central line "L9E" that shows the southward extention of the ovoid, that may be a mine in itself. Some months ago I called Murrey and I guessed that by following the upgoing colours in the south south-east direction shown at the bottom of the ovoid the ore body might continue about as much as or even with the capital "C" in the red "Vein Corridor" printing on that picture. When I explained my dotted line his response was that I could about double that. Since I believe that the survey lines are 500 m apart, and the first survey SSE looks about a 500 m.projection, then the next 3D might show that extention about 1000m! That is big!
The other interesting note from the report was the description of the amounts of Cu. Moly etc that were in such small amounts. That given, and with the surface samples of various grades of gold make it so very unlikely that the anomalies would turn up being copper, etc. (? 98.9% unlikely) Still, nothing is certain in our lives!
The third point that I have discussed before is the elevation of Dynacor, and their excellent grades also. What if they drilled and the ore keeps going on down and down and down? Thus our mountain of gold, and if one kept digging down to the elevation of the Acari River, what lies below the base of our mountain?
Can I pick Tues Feb 8th since it is my birthday.......A nice present.