It's great that you guys monitor this board and stop what has happened to stockhouse's board but I would like discuss your statement further.

"We are only human also, but we have rules here at Agoracom that helps us make our decisions. If its something bad about the company that is backed by fact, it belongs here on this forum to keep every investor of SLI informed. If its something bad about SLI and it is not backed by fact, it doesnt belong here."

Can this not only be said about statements that are bad about SLI as well as statements that are good. I know you guys are doing your best at this being the hub leaders role but maybe you should step back a bit and have a look. What you might see is that there are many posts or users that should be removed because they post good or outrageously good unproven statements about the reserves, cost to exploit, management plans and the like.

We all want to be informed of what is going on with the company and a lot of good work goes on here that is appreciated and I am thankfull for that. That being said good or bad statements that cannot be backed by fact are "opinions" and equally have the right to be on this board. We are all grown ups here and don't require as much protection as some might think. Speaking for myself, I have seen a lot of bashing and a lot of hype over many years about this stock and in both cases there have been many untruths or unsupstantiated claims. I have been able to sift through them and come to my own conclusions and have been a long time holder of this stock.

Also on another note, I read hog's post several times about Geer and still cannot see what it is that he did, am I missing something here? I didn't see any personal attack.

regards,

Longtime