Re: thoughts on drilling
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 10, 2011 09:38PM
Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE
So, CDN Bigfoot, you provided us with an excellent piece of art, IMO. Anyone trying to follow my post, I am referring to the overlay that CDN Bigfoot has given us in his post on this same thread.
If you look at the left side of both the big anomalies, you will see that they are straight and follow our left side border. That does not mean they end there! That is our current property line, so management ended them there. Now the second biggest anomaly and the biggest anomaly continue to the west off our property. To my knowledge, by looking at the tech report of last june, the property was open that the giant anomaly extends onto. There may be a possibility we can get this property also and get more of the giant anomaly. Someone may say, now I,m getting greedy. But stop and think about it for a minute. IMO, if we dont try to get it, someone else will, and if they get it, it may interfere with our bidders, in such a way that a suitor may opt to buy the little bit cheaper property before us.
The second biggest anomaly goes partly on to a consession owned by Minera Yura. There appears there is free property around this consession, but I suspect courtesy and respect may play a part in what happens here with the surrounding property, especially if it belongs to a local.
So it appears we may be putting 8 holes in the giant anomaly and 5 in the next biggest anomaly. Don,t forget the little bugger (the smallest anomaly of the 3, at this time), it looks like 2 holes will go into that one.
We still haven,t received all the 3D yet, IMO. There are so many more anomalies showing up on the individual slides that are not shown with the 3 biggest ones to date, although I suspect 3D of another giant anomaly around the Zona Incognito area.
I see Hog just posted another excellent angle! The grades are now overlayed that we pulled from the C-1, A-4 Workings and the surface samples. Look at the historic samples that were pulled from on top of these anomalies! Gold didn,t fall out of the sky, it came from beneath, and look whats beneath some of those amazing grades, you guessed it, the anomalies. Look at the g/t chart for the color codes, just to see how high some of these surface samples really are. Then think about conservative BOW using 1 g/t in his calculations and then scaling that back besides to an even less number. IMO,I dont beleive we are gonna have less than what BOW states.
IMO.