I always like using Exeter Resources for comparison purposes to our Giant Anomaly. Here is an excerpt below from Exeters web site giving the dimensions and grade of their deposit. This deposit contains 26 million ounces of gold of which 21 million ounces is proven.

Figure 3 shows the collar locations and provides an indication of the large ore body “footprint” outlined from drilling. Results and modeling indicate an orebody footprint to the mineralised system at +0.3 g/t gold approximately 1 cubic kilometre (0.62 cubic miles) in dimension.

So, if they have 26 million ounces of gold in a 1000m cube at +0.3 g/t, just how much do we have? Their geology is very similar to ours, thats another reason I like using them. But what their property doesn,t have, that we do, is astronomical grades. If I punch BOW,S 1 g/t gold into this equation, I come up with 78 million ounces. If I also punch into BOW,s size of the anomaly, 1800m x 1700m x 1300m, approx 18 times bigger than Exeters 1km cube, I come up with 1.4 billion ounces. scale that by 68% = 954 million ounces of gold in the Giant Anomaly.

LOL, I think I will leave the math to you BOW! At least your numbers are not this crazy.