Re: Some October thoughts
in response to
by
posted on
Oct 13, 2011 07:23PM
Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Excellent post greaser!
On your last line of your post, I beleive you mean we don,t have 250,000,000 million shares outstanding. Yes ,we only have approx half that at this point in the game. Not bad at all when you actually look we are at on the life of an explorer scale.
I would like to make a comment about the anomaly and the origins of the anomaly.
Lori has been quoted as saying we may have found the source of the Incan gold. IMO, we have only found part of the source, and that the source has much deeper origins as was touched on in a few posts before this.
What I am getting at, is this;
Conditions have to be right for gold to form, and obviously, it has to be present in the solution first. Conditions were right at the Dynacor elevation which is 1300m below us, if I remember correctly. I beleive its safe to say that the grade remained constant from the Dynacor elevation up to the top of the Tesoro. If this is the case, 16 g/t over 1300m verticle, it should be reasonable to assume that there is excellent chance for gold mineralization BELOW Dynacors elevation of at least 500m. This would put us at the 1800 meter mark BELOW the Tesoro Suface and at a level below the giant anomaly. Although the anomaly appears open at depth, it has the appearance of narrowing at depth. I beleive this appearance of narrowing is a deceiving assumption, that it appears this way because of the depth capacity of the Titan. Meaning the Titans depth limitations have been met, and what is considered narrowing, is actually the masking effect falsely showing that it ends.That the chargeability is that strong, that we can,t get a clear picture below this. This is where deep drilling of up to 1500m should be done verticle to test this. IMO, its possible the giant anomaly holds a much wider depth than what we are thinking.
Now, we have plate tectonics and a mesothermal system. These 2 geological events adds the depth to the picture. In mesothermal systems, gold can come out of solution at depths of 5-10 km BELOW the surface. So what I am thinking is that the anomaly is still not the SOURCE, but merely PART of the source. I don,t care how far gold may be found Below the anomaly (we should have enough in the anomaly), but What I am trying to show is that because of these things, that it should be reasonable to expect the mineralization to run much deeper towards the main source.
So just how rich will the anomaly be?
Well if my theory above is right, then you add the big globs of gold of up to 19 oz at the near surface, shouldn,t it be reasonable to explore the grade maybe being vertically constant from the top of the anomaly downward? If not being 19 oz (580 g/t), then ALL it has to be is 1 G/T. The 1 g/t is what BOW uses in his equations.
And another thing, BEFORE the plate tectonics and the mesothermal system started at the Tesoro. There was gold disseminated in the older rock, showing how rich the fluids have almost always been there in that region.
Its partly because of the way I think above, that it should not be too much to ask, to have the anomaly averaging 1 g/t. And this is why I get so pumped everytime I sit down and look at things from a different angle. All of this may not be right, but what if it is?
IMO