that a poster on stockhouse has tried to pick my post on metallic screening apart, claiming we have all the high grade intercepts reported, although he's not 100% sure of himself as he says '"the high grade intercepts are sent for re-assay which IMPLIES that we have received the first results and it has been reported"

When we have bulk samples that returned .24 g/t, 31 g/t and 64 g/t plus literally hundreds of samples that have returned in excess of 31 G/t , many in excess of 100 g/t , I have a hard time believing that Lori would consider 23.50 g/t, 19.74 g/t, 11.64 g/t, 9.71 g/t, 9.58 g/t and 9.43 g/t (the top 5 intercepts reported) as high grade intercepts and worthy of re-assaying.

Now when Paul Gray had his high grade samples sent for metallic screening, his top 5 samples came back, 231 g/t, 197.31 g/t, 181.93 g/t, 96.69 g/t and 57.60 g/t.

Those my friends is what I would consider High Grade samples.