This is the first thing you see when you visit their home page. These statements are far more pronounced than they were before. Do I detect a higher degree of confidence in their statements?

I believe what I mentioned in my previous post tonight about the possibility of us missing the Quantec target, may have to be changed.Lori was most likely doing as she said, testing the outer edges. You can see below how they are talking up their accuracy, "Using simultaneous high-density data collection, Quantec surveys indicate the position, volume and alteration of your resource"

I had to highlight the part above about how they say they can indicate position, volume and alteration of your resource"

1)Lets look at the position statement;

So, they are saying that they can rather pinpoint the deposit accurately.

2)the volume statement;

Now that is interesting! Their targets must be well defined and really accurate to be able to indicate volume. So, I am wondering, that all of the calculations of volume that BOW have done for us, may have a very certain degree of accuracy. If this were to be the case....

3)the alteration

So, they are saying that they can accurately distinguish the alteration in a resource. IMO, this is also huge and lends much verification for me of our images.

The World’s Most Reliable and Accurate Subsurface Images (Surface to 1.5Km Deep And Beyond)

Offering 10-1000 times more data points per receiver than any other geophysical survey system, Quantec Geoscience’s proprietary technologies reach depths other systems simply can’t see. Using simultaneous high-density data collection, Quantec surveys indicate the position, volume and alteration of your resource. So, you can confidently create your drill program, ensure better results for financing, and remove the expense of unnecessary drilling.

http://www.quantecgeoscience.com/