Three things

1) This one is still subject to regulatory approval as was the last announced one. The pricing of the other one seemed low that day whereas it can,t be below 25% of the sp. This may be why it had/was to be repriced?

2) Its non-brokered, so maybe there should not be a finders fee?

3) Its less dilution.

On another note;

this is on topic. They have 3 of our properties and any info could pertain to SLI. Also it is a major factor in seeing IGD funded so its able to meet the obligations of its option agreements with SLI.

IMO