Re: Predictions
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 18, 2012 01:17AM
Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Good evening Mr rover.
I can see by the thumbs up on this post of yours, that many agree with you. The problem I have with the so many thumbs up, is that I don,t believe they are coming from long SLI investors. As a matter of fact, I have seen no SLI longs respond favourably to yours or Mr H,s posts. Also, I suspect a lot of reinforcement of the bashers has signed up here with new accounts, prove that I am wrong.
Is the many thumbs up on yours and Mr H,s posts supposed to be some kind of discreditation scheme against me? Are you guys getting worried about something? You guys wouldn,t be staking the thumbs up, would ya? Prove me wrong.
There is also a member here, thats been here since Feb 12th this year. He violated BOWS post tonight for having a few too many exclamation marks in it, really. This member has never posted, he only hits the violation button on other people for the pettiest things. Its become clear of that posters intent. He won,t come out from behind the curtain so we can ban him, because most likely his purpose is to cause light turmoil on violations and add thumbs up to posts that requires them. Prove me wrong.
You say there is no MM on the stock. Prove that there isn,t. So far, what you guys class as proof, is very weak. If there is not an MM on the stock, then all the tactics of an MM is being used. Further more, an MM makes money on trading stocks and don,t need approval to trade , although sometimes they do have approved trades by the exchange.I don,t believe I ever said that SLI hired an MM, I don,t know where you guys got that from. Don,t put words in my mouth.
For you guys to be coming on here trying to downplay what I say with the most easiest links from a google search, I suggest you search a little deeper the next time you search to get a little more depth to the subjects, because obviously you are not getting the full picture. And to honest, I am kinda disappointed that you didn,t provide the opposite views, when you guys always seem so intent on getting me to present opposite ones.
IMO