I can,t help but going back to this interview many times and looking at it and what its purpose is/was. The word Magnate that Forbes used to describe Lori seems out of place at that time and now. I mean the word Magnate implies or suggests to me a pretty high up person, let alone the rest of the description,"self made". Self made implies she made it, it suggests" is", not that she may be. Why would Forbes put something out like this? If you look at the theme next to the Forbes name above the video, you will see the words "intelligent investing". So, I guess its safe to say, us SLI shareholders are intelligent investors. And, when Lori fills in the gaps in the releases, maybe this major discovery will be revealed and Lori can show the world that she is the "Self Made Mining Magnate".

http://video.forbes.com/fvn/inidaily/lori-mcclenahan-st-elias-mines-secrets-of-the-self-made/

Here is an example of a magnate, check out this ladies net worth of 29 billion and just this year became the worlds richest woman;

http://afr.com/p/business/companies/rinehart_makes_appeal_to_fairfax_jWyaXtPs80z1HE3KfaGU7O

Also, on the verge of a "major discovery", no minor discovery, no beating around the bush, major. We got it I believe, when the time is right.

IMO