Re: SLI & Proxy battle ?
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 14, 2013 04:21PM
Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE
I am posting a couple news releases from 1999 that shows that part of our management was involved in some sort of dissident take over.
I realize this is a long read, but believe me it is very interesting.
I have hilighted certain names that I will talk about in a following post.
I'm not sure if I am reading it correctly, so I will not put any "opinions" into this. I will let the reader decide.
First here is a post that was made onSilicon Investor on March 22, 1999:
Brad, THIS FOLLOWED SHORTLY AFTER: |
JUST A FEW WEEKS LATER THIS WAS RELEASED:
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA , CANADA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 14, 1999--
On Sunday, July 11, 1999, the Directors of Naxos Resources Ltd. received a Notice of Meeting setting a Directors' Meeting for July 13, 1999. nominees to the Board of Directors, Lloyd Brewer and Lawrence Brierley. The Notice of Meeting stated that the meeting would be held at the residence of Dr. Brierley in Victoria, B.C. and that Directors may "participate via teleconference", a procedure that has been consistently followed at Naxos' Board of Directors Meetings in the past. the Chairperson and, in that capacity, called the meeting to order and proceeded to take a roll call, identifying that four members were present in person in Victoria (Brewer, Brierley, Gerard Gallissant and Jim Sahlin) and that the remaining three members of the Board were present via teleconference (Daphne Elworthy, Stan Combs and Bruce Downing). Victoria were Mr. Brewer's wife and his lawyer. Mr. Brewer immediately asked if any members of the Board objected to the participation in the meeting by teleconference. As there was no response, Mr. Brewer repeated this question and Mr. Gallissant responded that he did have a concern. Mr. Brewer interrupted, informing the meeting that if there was an objection, Directors attending by teleconference would not have a right to participate. Mr. Brewer, as Chair, then stated that since there was a quorum A majority of an entire body; e.g., a quorum of a legislative assembly. pass a law, make a judgment, or conduct business. present at Dr. Brierley's home in Victoria, the meeting would go ahead without permitting participation by the Directors present by teleconference. effectively stating that he would not participate in a meeting that was deliberately designed to exclude certain Directors from participating in the meeting. Mr. Sahlin then promptly left the meeting. participating by teleconference did not form part of the meeting and as a result of Mr. Sahlin's departure from the meeting, there was no quorum and the meeting was thus effectively adjourned. continued informal discussion with the end result that Messrs. Gallissant, Brewer and Brierley immediately tendered their verbal resignations and disconnected the conference call. The company has now received the written resignations of Messrs. Gallissant, Brewer and Brierley, effective immediately. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Naxos+Resources+Ltd.+--+Announcement.-a055159149 |