Can anyone explain why a CEO of any company would fight in court about shareholders proposing a $90,000 trust fund to hold the Peruvian properties in good standing for ALL SHAREHOLDERS, for perhaps a couple years if the amount would have sufficed to do so?

Rumour has it, that Lori did just that, perhaps a court transcript may be the proof, if someone requires it.

For me, the only logical reason why a CEO would not want to secure the Peruvian properties, may be that she had no intent of keeping these valuable, once referred to as possible "world class" properties.

Since that trust fund offer was rejected, shareholders have witnessed the sale of the Cueva Blanca for a measly $100,000, when historical resource estimate/s suggest that it had a value in the ground of around $400,000,000.

tsk,tsk,tsk....