It will be of no difficulty in tracking these properties futures, there are other means.

I believe it very important that you have found out that the vegencias/property good standing fees; have not been paid by IGD for two years. This portrays further neglect of responsibility my SLI management to assure the asset for not only SLI shareholders, but IGD shareholders as well. Further neglect is added to the supervising agencies, such as the TSX, for allowing this rampant display of fudiciary duty by our management. Whereas Lori is the common denominator, as president of BOTH IGD and SLI, there is no rational excuse for this neglect, other than it is intentional and motivated. Do I pass judgement upon Lori? No, she has passed judgement upon herself, obviously evident through her actions, or should I say neglect of actions congruent with investors best interests.

To further, the aquisition of TTAGIT had to be ratified by a shareholder vote to be valid, did any IGD shareholders remember voting their approval for such a transaction? When I asked Jeffery Shon, a compliance officer with the TSX, he would not answer this very serious query nor elaborate. It is very obvious to me, that Jeffery Shon, plays a part in this preposterous exploitation of SLI/IGD shareholders, to the extent that he is able to turn blind eyes on violation to policies and securities law. Alan Costan of the BCSC is also neglecting the rights of shareholders by sitting on crucial evidence and allowing a "stall tactic" to apply confidence to an intentional plan of deprivation of SLI shareholders.

The above two mentioned, only two of many I may add, that are in grave jeopardy of answering to Natural Law, are becoming more aware of the transparency of the implications I speak of. Under Common/Natural Law, they can be held responsible for their part in this fiasco, as well as any employees that have assisted in concealing the truth. As I mentioned before, I feel that at least 3 RCMP officers on this case, are questioning the Crown prosecutors decision of not going forward with charges in this case. It is the realization of these RCMP officers, that something is very wrong with the system, that will awaken them further and possibly enhance any legal proceedings under Natural Law in the future, in the respect to SLI.

These RCMP officers were in receipt of an initial testimony from at least two different sources that the stock price was going to be intentionally hit by management, this is sole intent of FRAUD, and for a Crown Prosecutor to ignore this evidence, is actually illegal and a criminal action on his part. To further, the first legal proceeding which saw a B.C. judge employing the stature of an Advance Notice Policy , which had to be ratified by shareholders to be valid, only integrates further, the mechanisms of oppression and suppression of the shareholders voice, which is contradictory to the Charter of Rights, in some respects, not to mention the illegal aspect of his decision to recognize a document as law when in fact, it contained no merit whatsoever. For one to understand why a judge would accept an unapproved instrument as Law and allow it to stand as an enforceable contract, they may very easily believe that this judge was paid off by a considerable amount, whereas he would have to factor the value of his career into any future implications his decision may have on SLI investors and the general public.

As for Justice Steeves, he had many fair remedies that he could have easily employed, but suspiciously, he seemed to focus on technicalities related to an Advance Notice policy, that is invalid. He therefore took a biased position that didnot recognize the concerns of the majority and even the public in his decision, quite an embarrassment for him and the judicial system which he represents. The fairest decision he could have made was by employing his arbitrary power of ordering another AGM/vote, which would have settled this whole thing in an unbiased way.

Thank you

Rick Jewers