As I review this filing by "Geneva Resources", the wording seems to suggest the possibility of a hiddem owner of the Vilcoro. If you read the excerpt below which I have underlined and bolded the important part, it seems to suggest to me, that Geneva wasn't readily concerned with Brophy's interests in the Vilcoro, but perhaps the identity of the TRUE owner. Its because of the word "including" that suggests there is another owner involved but not mentioned in this filing.

On November 10, 2008, we commenced legal proceedings in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada against each of St. Elias and John Brophy, P. Geol. We sought rescission of the Property Option Agreement and the return of all funds and shares advanced by us to St. Elias. We alleged that St. Elias failed to properly discharge its duty as an operator of the Vilcoro Property and also alleged that each of St. Elias and Mr. Brophy failed to provide us with complete and accurate information relating to the ownership of the Vilcoro Property and to the ownership of the adjacent property, including failing to disclose that Mr. Brophy and his wife had an interest in the Vilcoro Property and the adjacent property. We also alleged that St. Elias used some of the exploration funds provided by us to fund the exploration of the adjoining property.

Read more: http://www.getfilings.com/sec-filings/111107/Geneva-Resources-Inc_10-K.A/#ixzz3WBvNBx7a

I suspect that IF there is another silent owner involved, that it is none other than Barrick Gold.

Rick Jewers