From time to time, you may see, "who said this, who said that". Please let it not be a preconceived notion that shareholders are blaming certain posters for what went wrong with their investment to any degree, namely the poster "Primed".

The facts of the matter are:

In the begining, in 2011, "Primed" was a pro SLI presenter, with many educational posts and very positive perspectives on SLI. Then there came a time around Aug 2011 when Primed started to downplay his own previous posts/views, and transcended to a point , over a relatively short time, where his views began totally contradicting his previous work.

It was relatively accepted then, Primed's pro SLI views and calculations, and those initial views and calculations are still accepted today . What is not accepted today and since late 2011, by the SLI shareholders, is his 180 turn around, which has him literally denying and contradicting his earlier work/posts. If you look at his earlier work, do the research and the calculations, you will find that his work then presented very credulous possibilities. These possibilities are still very possible today, because nothing has changed with the historic data those posts were based upon, the only thing that changed, was the new data from the drill program, which is really totally disconnected data, which in turn, is not consistent at all, with the historic data.

So, its not the information in Primed's original posts that shareholders are refuting with him, but, it is his total 180 turn on his views that follow the blatant inconsistencies of management since his turn around. For someone to do a 180 degree turn around which supportedly defies science and historic data, it becomes a very suspicious action.