Beyondhelp,

I see you didn't reply to any of the lucid questions in my previous post, so I'll ty with this one.

I also note you never answered the question as to what your interest is here if you don't hold any shares?

"When you were charged with Defermation of Character, you basically ended any hope of relationship with Lori by saying things that were untrue of her. Lori's reaction to you was only to be expected. That is why I asked that no on who has been charged by the company be at the meeting if any meeting is generated in the first place."

Why are YOU asking that "no on" (sic) "who has been charged by the company be at the meeting"?

Are YOU making the rules for Lori now?

How do YOU know "you basically ended any hope of relationship with Lori"

Did Lori tell you that? How close to Lori are you please?

"Negotiation is a dialogue between two or more people or parties intended to reach a beneficial outcome.

Correct, but how can you negotiate "without making demands of the other side"?

"You are right that you have few options left to negotate with at this point"

So what's the point of entering any dialogue then?

To be dictated to?

"Generation of funds was listed as a topic for discussion and funds were offered."

The issue is that raising funds would give voting control back to Lori, which is why it was voted down in the first place!

Nothing has changed, so why would anyone now want to finance Lori?

I cannot believe you seriously think peope are going to finance Lori again after what transpired before. Think of the comments made about "Albertans"!

This all looks very transparent to me, I cannot believe people will fall for this.