Circus board
posted on
Dec 02, 2011 01:00PM
Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE
I was directed to the other forum of SLI on another site to look at something. From time to time, I will get a call or PM to this effect. I don,t pay much attention to that site and rarely read what is written there because of the nature of the content. I guess there are many that use both sites to try and get a balanced opinion. On this site, we have rules, a couple of those, we can,t bash management or the company, attack each other and make statements of grandeur. The other site allows almost any type of discussion.
I just read a post by a guy over there this morning, that has misinterpreted the posts of Mrs Cramer, Silverback and myself. He went further to say that the 3 of us were insinuating that Lori was lying. It was not my intent to insinuate, nor do I beleive it was the other 2 posters intent. We were merely discussing this and using deductive reasoning to come to a conclusion. The poster at the circus site seems to like to try to discredit me, and others, possibly for his own benefit/agenda, whatever that may be. I will let you guys here know that us hub leaders have a pretty good idea who that poster is and he was pretty much revealed when his IP address showed up with another persons account.This kind of stuff is retarded and childless, and I myself try not get tangled up in this playing. Nevertheless, its plain to see that there is an established agenda by a few and you can most likely see the effect in our sp as a result. Some of them bash when the sp is going down, then turn around and pump, when its going up, this to me clearly establishes what their agenda is. There are so many superficial people that can,t think for theirselves and jump the gun when something doesn,t look right. Instead of taking their time and researching out the material before speaking, they will go with the first thing that pops into their heads. Most often, this conclusion jumping turns out to be mistakes. There will be a lot of info taken from this site, because they don,t know how to do their own properly, then its twisted on another site to suit their agenda. One thing they mistakenly do with my posts, is to read them for face value and don,t look between the lines for the underlying meaning, I write my posts this way on purpose to let the people reading do a bit of thinking of their own. Now to be blunt;
When we were discussing the Assay topic yesterday, we had some good imput trying to put into perspective why we had assays paid for at Aug 31st. The most logical conclusion is that we were drilling long before the Aug 17th NR and that there were assays in before Aug 31. But that may very well not be the case and in no way were we insinuating that Lori was lying, we were just trying to figure out what was going on by using our knowledge put together and using a bit of deductive reasoning.
Lori could have very well been drilling for awhile and had assays paid for up front to get them done quicker, then retracted the assays because she knew she had to do a PP.She could have very well not known that assays were shipped and when she found out, put a hold on them .There are so many paths and reasons here that to find the right or closest one that fits, we use probability and the elimination process.The discussion on this is not finished and it will be brought up again when we have more info to go on.
In closing, we all know this project has great potential and Lori knows more than any of us just how much it really has.If this is anywhere near what some of us suspect it easily explains Lori secretive behaviour and increases the probability of her making little mistakes because of all the things she has to do to help get the maximum deal for all shareholders. It must be driving her crazy to keep all the info bottled up inside her and trying to do things right. Its my beleif that just a few assay results from either trenching or drilling, or even some info on how many new gold bearing veins the trenching found, could prompt a premature offer. If that happened, the premature offer thing, Lori would most likely want as much info at her fingertips as possible to lock in the assurance that shareholders would not be selling at the first offer and upset the balance of shares needed to thwart a hostile bid. This way, if a premature bid did come, she does not have to rush drilling and increase the chances of mistakenly drill in the less prominant spots. Time is needed to understand the deposit and I beleive she got the time she needed.
Its interesting that the crew in Peru is now being expanded, with more geo,s going there. We have Kevin from Quantec there, Brophy, James Thom and now Lioyd going with a couple others. Why the sudden expansion?
IMO