As i read the result i was thinking, got to go deeper, got to go deeper and there it was in the 4th paragraph....It may be that the hole did not go deep enough or there is no obvious contact zone in this area. The strong EM anomaly remains unexplained.

From the 3rd paragraph....

Due to the size and strength of the EM anomaly in this area, a larger sulphide section was anticipated. The area warrants another drill hole if a strong EM anomaly can be located along.

Is it me or are they just not going deep enough to begin with?

Perhaps a vertical exploration hole centered in the anomaly would be prudent to facilitate

BHEM, to help guide drilling.

Is Jim going to run BHEM on the holes reported??

looking forward to seeing the results of this drilling that's starting up this weekend.

Good stuff going forward