Kent, I agree with everything you said in your post. As with NCS, it seems like there are a lot of educated investors on this board, and there are logical steps that need to be followed. However, 19 months ago Paul told Geoff that the production from the first line was sold. There were no disclaimers, no conditions. What has changed? There can be only three reasons that orders didn't follow the completion of the production line relative to Paul's earlier remarks: 1.) Paul's remarks were uneducated, exagerated and ambitious. 2.) There were specific reasons why order commitments were cancelled by legitimate customers. 3.) Paul's remarks were intended to generate interest by intentionally misleading investors. Investors are owed an explanation. It's pretty easy to generate interest and excitement without all the facts. Then when things don't turn out, it's easier yet to present facts that explain why things take so long to materialize, or why they couldn't materialize at all. It's my opinion that those facts should have been presented, and considered, at the onset. Just my opinion. Jeff