Mark,

Sorry... but, I don't think I understand your point if it's something other than the obvious.

What is it about Vyta, managed in part by the management team of Nanopierce, that is supposed to inspire investors to go deeper into their pockets for a venture that is far more difficult to get a handle on at this point in time than was Nanopierce?

Maybe I just don't get something that others are obviously motivated in some way to see differently. Why should I need to defend a position of rational and conversative thought based upon years business failures and overly optimistic (and sometimes questionable) statements about the nature of the business? Quite frankly, I'm surprised there aren't more people demanding even more transparency. It's time that management be accountable for their actions.

I'll admit that should someone wish to speculate on something new, it is much different than a calculated investment. For a new investor, maybe this looks like an ideal speculative venture. For any investor with a Nanopierce history, I wonder why this time should be viewed any differently.

Jeff