pmb,

You seem to think that something is true just because you say it.

You stated that there were no revenues.

I pointed out that there were over $104,000 in revenues reported in the 10Q.

Your statement was false and based on your opinion, not facts. Simply putting a disclaimer at the end of every post does't justify posting inaccurate information as if it were true.

I am not telling you you need to learn anything about chickens or science. I am saying that if you are going to make statements about factual information contained in the SEC filings, why not learn what is in the filings and base your statements on fact, not on your assumptions.

It is my opinion that when you try to pass off inaccurate information as fact, you are doing a disservice to other investors who just might think you know what you are talking about, and that you, in turn, damage my investment, as well as your own.

You have attempted to discredit the sum of my posts by characterizing them as offering "rainbows lollipops and gumdrops", but have failed to point out any inaccuracies in anything I have posted. On the other hand, I have pointed out your inaccuracy, and you have chosen to respond by saying, "I choose not to recognize the facts as you see them due to the fact that they have no positive impact on the shareholder value whatsoever."

That's cool. Just so we're clear on your position that facts are only facts if you choose to recognize them...

Is that what you mean by, "I am open minded"?

-zties