I raised the very same qustion in the past and no one responded with an answer.

My own theory is, again this is just my own belief, that the government had a change of mind and went the way of the mining mandate and just ditched the stability agreement approach. With that in mind, I think the stability agreement concept is dead. After all you can't have a legal agreement, even when it is with the government, that supersedes the law of the land (i.e., the mining law). However, I am not a legal expert and that is just my assumption.