Re: Let's state the obvious......
posted on
Nov 21, 2011 12:50PM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
Golfyeti...I agree that the ES looks fragmented. There are a couple of promising areas (to this non-geologist):
larger: http://www.copperfoxmetals.com/s/Image.asp?i=maps/3D-CHARGEABILITY-15mrad_Block_Mod[2].jpg&id=485514
1) the area of the under the label "2800N" (LHS), nr DDH 422. This is is a rather significant blob that has good (?, pink) chargeability running right to the surface.
2) the area around DDhAS- 16 - looks like the top of a bubble. Open to the east
3) the whole region around the label "L9650E" in the south. looks like a sigificant extention of what is at SC deposit and open to the south. This is the area that Elmer speaks of in the Aerial Mag NR:
The airborne magnetic signature over the Schaft Creek deposit correlates well with the Quantec Titan-24 DCIP and MT survey results (see news release dated November 16, 2010) and suggests that the Schaft Creek deposit could extend for an additional 1,000 metres (m) to the south, .
What I worry about is that there is a nice 'blob' on the east side of the saddle that looks promising but I believe was rulled out by condemnation drilling. Much of this area is under the future airstrip and other infrastructure.