I have been in CUU for about 1.5 years. It has been a nice ride up and down, and my average cost is about $1.37.

What I want to know is the fact that since the BFS will not have the silver numbers in there, how can we possibly be still around the -$0.32 costs to produce the copper? I know the 3 year average numbers for Au, Ag, Mo, and Cu are higher since the last prefeasabilty study, but I can't see us being able to produce at negative costs.

I know our land contains lots of silver. My worry is that many investors don't really read news releases correctly. They might look at BFS numbers and sell like what happened when the RE was released last year.

I guess what I am trying to say is that the BFS will probably show a higher cost of producing copper since silver numbers are not included. But in hindsight, the BFS numbers will not be a correct correlation of our true assets.