Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Copper Fox vs. Seabridge - Part 2
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View

Seabridge Initial Capex: $5312M

Operating Costs: $13.81/tonne

One of the large expenses for Seabridge is the tunnels that they will require for ore transportation and water diversion. Copper Fox will not require tunnels so we have some savings there. After removing some of the costs associated with the tunnels, Seabridge's capex comes in around $4B. As far as operating costs go, I think Seabridge and Copper Fox will be quite similar. Seabridge has the advantage of high pressure grinding rolls (HPGR) whereas we have the advantage of a geographically friendly site layout.

Copper Fox Initial Capex: $4000M?

Operating Costs: $13.00/tonne?

Icon president Re: Copper Fox vs. Seabridge - Part 2
9
Chappy726
May 14, 2012 10:26PM
Re: Copper Fox vs. Seabridge - Part 2
1
RabidTiger
May 14, 2012 10:35PM
Re: Copper Fox vs. Seabridge - Part 2

Metacomet
May 14, 2012 11:01PM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply