Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Copper Fox vs. Seabridge - Part 2
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Copper Fox vs. Seabridge - Part 2

RabidTiger
May 14, 2012 10:00PM

Good stuff RT.

We'll save in some places and pay in others. We have some skokum bridges to build across the Mess. Our talings and water management seems less complicated. We only have one steep mountain corner to deal with, they have 3 whole mountain sides and an underground component.

This video is dated but a good overview for comparison to Schaft. Their whole mining plan (deposit, digging, wasting and waste management) seems much more complicated http://www.seabridgegold.net/News/Article/294/ksm-video

Their NPV of $4,469M, IRR of 11.5%, 6.2 yrs to payback @ 5% discount is worth noting. That NPV drops to $1.594B when calculated @ 8%...

See http://seabridgegold.net/KSM2012ExecSum.pdf

This executive summary is a good read for prep for our own BFS. Same company (Tetra Tech) under Jim Gray's same watchfull eyes...

9 Recommendations
Re: Copper Fox vs. Seabridge - Part 2
1
RabidTiger
May 14, 2012 10:35PM
Re: Copper Fox vs. Seabridge - Part 2

Metacomet
May 14, 2012 11:01PM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply