Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: This week?
1
Nov 18, 2012 09:09PM
1
Nov 18, 2012 09:29PM

Nov 18, 2012 09:32PM
1
Nov 18, 2012 09:36PM
7
Nov 18, 2012 10:29PM
3
Nov 18, 2012 10:55PM

Nov 19, 2012 08:14AM
6
Nov 19, 2012 09:10AM
3
Nov 19, 2012 09:22AM
4
Nov 19, 2012 11:41AM
6
Nov 19, 2012 11:54AM

Nov 19, 2012 11:56AM
5
Nov 19, 2012 11:58AM
2
Nov 19, 2012 12:01PM
1
Nov 19, 2012 12:01PM
2
Nov 19, 2012 12:01PM
14
Nov 19, 2012 12:02PM
1
Nov 19, 2012 12:05PM
3
Nov 19, 2012 12:07PM
3
Nov 19, 2012 12:08PM
3
Nov 19, 2012 12:08PM
3
Nov 19, 2012 12:09PM
3
Nov 19, 2012 12:10PM
6
Nov 19, 2012 12:13PM
15
Nov 19, 2012 12:25PM
4
Nov 19, 2012 12:25PM
3
Nov 19, 2012 12:28PM
3
Nov 19, 2012 12:33PM
1
Nov 19, 2012 12:35PM
2
Nov 19, 2012 12:37PM
27
Nov 19, 2012 12:40PM
4
Nov 19, 2012 12:45PM
2
Nov 19, 2012 12:52PM
5
Nov 19, 2012 12:56PM
21
Nov 19, 2012 12:59PM
3
Nov 19, 2012 01:07PM
14
Nov 19, 2012 01:08PM
6
Nov 19, 2012 01:11PM
7
Nov 19, 2012 01:16PM
1
Nov 19, 2012 01:16PM
4
Nov 19, 2012 01:20PM
4
Nov 19, 2012 01:24PM

Nov 19, 2012 01:25PM
1
Nov 19, 2012 01:27PM
1
Nov 19, 2012 01:27PM
25
Nov 19, 2012 01:30PM
3
Nov 19, 2012 01:35PM
3
Nov 19, 2012 01:35PM

Nov 19, 2012 01:37PM

Nov 19, 2012 01:38PM
3
Nov 19, 2012 01:44PM
1
Nov 19, 2012 01:58PM
8
Nov 19, 2012 02:10PM
1
Nov 19, 2012 02:17PM

Those are all positives for cuu shareholders, our management is to look after our interests not tecks, those are all part of an agreement in which would still be involved in negotiations how does that change if they release the bfs negatively for us? I understand the whole situation but no where in the agreement does it state we are to worry about shafting our investors for tecks interest.

I assume you mean positive for Teck? It's positive for both of us. Mutually beneficial because we get at the least, a serious offer from Teck by kind of helping them a long the way. It's the least hassle free to sell to Teck because of the agreement and its complications, and in turn is better for us shareholders. Do you really think if Teck is negotiating with us and they request we don't immediately release the BFS - that the best course of action is to release the BFS...when again, the most convenient and probably best route is to sell to Teck?

That post I can agree with everyone here is putting a positive spin on this, I can not for the life of me see how releasing bfs can affect negotiations as a share holder I believe we should know what the value in the ground is worth if there is a negative impact from releasing it so be it. That's the chance you take if its positive great that's why I invested but holding it and not allowing the chips to fall where they may is just wrong. Any buyout should reflect pounds in the ground and future exploration potential not whether shareholders get to see the bfs or not. All these other issues laird shares ect, are in the agreement should not be a factor whatsoever on us seeing the bfs.

I never meant to imply we wouldn't see the BFS. In fact, I said it's likely we'll see it in tandum (offer and BFS released at the same time). You can't just say release it because you're impatient, even if it's negative for all shareholders overall... Again, the buyout probably will be reflective of what's in the ground, the value of certain intangibles etc. but the BFS is only a tool used to get us bought out. The actual important thing is....just that, getting bought out. Teck can make the first offer, and that doesn't mean there won't be a bidding war, but we should help those who want to buy us out.

1
Nov 19, 2012 02:29PM
39
Nov 19, 2012 02:41PM
6
Nov 19, 2012 02:41PM
4
Nov 19, 2012 02:46PM
2
Nov 19, 2012 02:46PM
2
Nov 19, 2012 03:08PM
2
Nov 19, 2012 03:17PM
3
Nov 19, 2012 03:32PM

Nov 19, 2012 03:34PM

Nov 19, 2012 03:49PM
2
Nov 19, 2012 04:12PM
7
Nov 19, 2012 04:14PM
6
Nov 19, 2012 04:21PM

Nov 19, 2012 04:24PM

Nov 19, 2012 04:27PM

Nov 19, 2012 04:28PM
3
Nov 19, 2012 04:39PM

Nov 19, 2012 04:44PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply