Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Delivery of BFS to Teck
5
Dec 28, 2012 07:00PM
11
Dec 28, 2012 07:06PM
3
Dec 28, 2012 07:33PM
6
Dec 28, 2012 08:24PM
6
Dec 28, 2012 09:16PM

Dec 28, 2012 10:21PM

Dec 28, 2012 10:26PM
2
Dec 28, 2012 10:43PM
2
Dec 28, 2012 11:10PM
1
Dec 28, 2012 11:12PM
1
Dec 29, 2012 01:13AM
11
Dec 29, 2012 01:58AM
4
Dec 29, 2012 02:26AM
9
Dec 29, 2012 08:29AM
13
Dec 29, 2012 10:39AM
3
Dec 29, 2012 10:53AM
6
Dec 29, 2012 11:01AM
3
Dec 29, 2012 11:09AM
2
Dec 29, 2012 11:13AM
3
Dec 29, 2012 12:15PM
11
Dec 29, 2012 02:48PM
8
Dec 29, 2012 03:23PM
3
Dec 29, 2012 03:44PM
2
Jan 11, 2013 09:32PM
12
Jan 11, 2013 11:47PM
5
Jan 12, 2013 04:39AM
16
Jan 12, 2013 07:03AM
18
Jan 12, 2013 08:15AM
5
Jan 12, 2013 10:16AM
6
Jan 12, 2013 11:09AM
3
Jan 12, 2013 11:23AM
3
Jan 12, 2013 11:28AM

I normally do not post but I have seen this question too many times and really feel that I need to chime in. From our side, I definitely agree that their IR has been especially horrible over the last few months.

However I think we need to look at this from a company's perspective. I do not think the cost-benefit truly justifies this company spending money on an IR team. When you take into consideration the purpose of this company, IR just isn't that important. CUU is a very unique case in the sense that the majority of funding actually does not come from public investors. It has been said many many times that our value is not derived from our SP but rather getting the deal done with Teck. If shareholders are providing minimal funding to the company and SP is not a priority, it doesn't make sense to spend additional resources into hiring a team for something that just isn't that important at the end of the day.

Your question is ultimately based off of opportunity cost. Elmer spending time on phone means less time getting work done, correct? What exactly is that cost? Maybe 1 hour max a day? Also, money spent on hiring an IR department team means less money being put towards our final goal.

So the question at the end of the day is whether Elmer's time on the phone > cost of hiring IR. Given the purpose of this company, I would probably say no.

2
Jan 12, 2013 04:35PM
4
Jan 12, 2013 04:37PM
2
Jan 12, 2013 04:42PM
6
Jan 12, 2013 04:57PM
5
Jan 12, 2013 05:06PM
10
Jan 12, 2013 05:10PM
1
Jan 12, 2013 06:52PM
5
Jan 17, 2013 11:33AM
6
Jan 17, 2013 12:00PM
1
Jan 31, 2013 10:51AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply