Honest, whomever is hiding behind his 'banning' finger needs to come out into the open as this is ridiculous behaviour. I've just received a violation report - for what??? MTS

=======

Thanks for posting and participating on AGORACOM.

Unfortunately, the post below was reported as a violation. This is not an indication of your overall contributions to AGORACOM. Rather, in an attempt to keep our forums clean and constructive for the benefit of you and all members, we tend to take a strict approach when enforcing our 6 Rules of Use. We trust you will agree that it is better to take this approach and maintain a high quality environment, even if it leads to the occasional deletion of your posts.

Thank-you for your understanding and continued participation on AGORACOM. The cleanest and most constructive stock forums on the web.

To review the AGORACOM 6 Rules of Use, please go to: http://agoracom.com/rules

---
Original message:

This message was posted by Willy Nilly at 11:28 am this morning: Someone posted this almost exact same comment yesterday. If anyone thinks that the colour of the BC government will in some way negatively influence the construction of a mine at Schaft Creek by whoever ends up owning it, please take it to the OT forum. That's where discussion of politics belongs because, as far as Schaft Creek is concerned, it's irrelevant. ===== Is it just my imagination that Willy Nilly only seems to surface with irate comments when someone gets banned? I think we should have full disclosure on this board and the 'banner' be identified, and reasons given for the ban. My apologies to you Willy Nilly if it was not you who banned Cranecrane but it does start to look suspicous over time. MTS