I am very supportive of an open discussion and agree that there is often a knee jerk reaction to anything negative

If you wish to be a serious participant in this forum, I think you need to establish that you have a valid concern about Copper Fox being a successful project and provide verifiable information, or valid arguments that might bear on the success or failure of this project

Valid negative information is welcomed by me

I have spent years trying to find any of it I could

What you brought did not pass the smell test

Elmer has had a long career in the junior mining industry

It is an industry frought with risk and uncertainty

I believe something well above 80% of all such initiatives fail

Nobody in this industry for long bats 1000%

So what you brought was not only irrelevent to Copper Fox, it was presented in a way that suggests that you are at odds with the objectives of all the honest posters here

Unless you have specific information that Elmer has done something that may contribute to the failure of this project, it is simply bashing

To be sure the jury is still out, and there may be something to the smoke you cited

But that is not how you presented it

So my feeling is that until you provide some evidence that you are on the same side of this thing as I am, I am more inclined to believe you are simply a basher with a short position, or more likely no position at all

Prove me wrong